VPG威世精密
1看多0看空1提及
8-10 分观点使用大徽标▲ 看多▼ 看空● 提及
历史观点(2 条,最新在上)
- English · 原文Well $VPG ended up tripling since my thesis post. I got the ASP wrong in my original thesis, was $150 mass production rather than ~$750 midpoint quoted by management. And $TSLA design out risk made me cut concentration. But 3x regardless not too shabby. https://t.co/ksB8ZrnnEg中文 · 翻译$VPG 从我的观点分享到现在,已经涨了三倍了。 当初我那个 thesis 里 ASP 算错了,实际量产价格是 $150,不是管理层说的中点价大概 $750。 而且 $TSLA 设计被踢出的风险,也让我减了仓位。 不过不管怎么说,3 倍也挺不错了。https://t.co/ksB8ZrnnEg
- English · 原文Fun fact: Lot of the same companies are often used across different supply chains. One likely example is: $SIVE as the upstream laser supplier to Boston Dynamics via: Sivers -> $AEVA FMCW (CW DFB lasers) -> LG Innotek -> Boston Dynamics. I actually personally liked Aeva for 4D AI first. Just so happened to find out Sivers was their high confidence laser supplier for 4D FMCW lidar. So you actually get robotics exposure with photonics while the same CW lasers used for hyperscaler AI DCs. Near term revenue ramp though it's probably $SIVE supplying laser volume ramp for $NVDA self-driving car related architectures though Aeva. Humanoids are probably later in 2028? You can always get more indirect exposure like MU with memory or $INTC with edge CPUs, but of course there's more direct exposure out there. Think I've already covered a lot of names in the past like $VPG or Harmonic Drive. But hilariously enough CPO players like $SIVE are a core part of frontier physical AI development.中文 · 翻译有意思的是,很多公司其实会同时出现在不同的供应链里。 一个可能的例子是:$SIVE 作为波士顿动力的上游激光供应商,路径是这样的: Sivers → $AEVA FMCW(连续波 DFB 激光器)→ LG Innotek → 波士顿动力。 坦白说,我一开始是因为 4D AI 才看好 Aeva 的。 后来才发现 Sivers 是他们 4D FMCW 激光雷达的高确信度激光供应商。 所以你看,你可以通过光子学同时参与机器人赛道,因为同样的连续波激光器也用于超大规模 AI 数据中心。 不过要说到近期的收入爬坡,大概率是 $SIVE 通过 Aeva 为 $NVDA 自动驾驶相关架构提供激光器的量产规模。 人形机器人可能要到 2028 年之后? 你也可以找一些更间接的参与方式,比如 MU 做内存、$INTC 做边缘 CPU,不过当然市场上也有更直接的标的。 我记得我之前已经聊过不少名字了,比如 $VPG 或者 Harmonic Drive。但搞笑的是,像 $SIVE 这样的 CPO 玩家,反而是前沿物理 AI 开发的核心部分。