BABA
0看多0看空2提及
8-10 分观点使用大徽标▲ 看多▼ 看空● 提及
历史观点（2 条，最新在上）
- English · 原文I mean if $BABA Qwen marketshare increases from distilling Anthropic models effectively. Rewards outweigh the risks because there's been no penalties (which is why they're doing this). Lot of US AI startups have been using Qwen lately cause of how cost effective it is vs. Gemini and others... But so far optically, no getting caught is bearish. Not sure why more things aren't done on the US side enforcing penalties for this though.中文 · 翻译我的意思是，如果 $BABA 的千问通过蒸馏 Anthropic 模型有效提升市占率，那收益大于风险，因为目前还没受过惩罚（所以他们才会这么干）。 最近很多美国 AI 初创公司都在用千问，因为跟 Gemini 和其他模型比，性价比太高了…… 但到目前为止从表面上看，没被抓到就是利空。 不过我也搞不懂，为啥美国这边不采取更多措施来执行惩罚呢。
- English · 原文Today, Anthropic has directly accused the $BABA Qwen AI lab of distilling its frontier AI models. By creating thousands of fake accounts and over 28.8 million exchanges. Feels like this is kind of known by now... but there's been no real penalties enforced yet. We'll see what happens.中文 · 翻译今天，Anthropic 直接指控 $BABA 的 Qwen AI 实验室蒸馏它的前沿 AI 模型。 通过创建数千个虚假账户以及超过 2880 万次交互。 感觉这事儿现在大家都知道了……但至今也没什么真正的处罚措施落实。 咱们拭目以待吧。